<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: (S)Wordplay in Portsmouth and the ACLU</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.randomyak.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1779" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.randomyak.com/?p=1779</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:58:28 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Random Yak</title>
		<link>http://www.randomyak.com/?p=1779&#038;cpage=1#comment-3230</link>
		<dc:creator>Random Yak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 10:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomyak.com/?p=1779#comment-3230</guid>
		<description>Discretion, yes.  

I still think it&#039;s a good example of the kind of &quot;form over substance&quot; approach to policy that suggests good sense took a vacation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Discretion, yes.  </p>
<p>I still think it&#8217;s a good example of the kind of &#8220;form over substance&#8221; approach to policy that suggests good sense took a vacation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maniyak</title>
		<link>http://www.randomyak.com/?p=1779&#038;cpage=1#comment-3226</link>
		<dc:creator>Maniyak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 04:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomyak.com/?p=1779#comment-3226</guid>
		<description>The school officials doubtless were thinking that if they did not ban all weapons, however innocuous, then they would have to make decisions about when weapons were being displayed appropriately or inappropriately, which would involve them in content-based censorship of speech and raise First Amendement freedom of speech issues.  But in fact the U.S. Supreme Court already addressed this kind of problem in Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier, in which the Court said that school officials could engage in content-based editing or exclusion from school publications.  A year book is a school publication and the school officials have the discretion to permit this harmless photo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The school officials doubtless were thinking that if they did not ban all weapons, however innocuous, then they would have to make decisions about when weapons were being displayed appropriately or inappropriately, which would involve them in content-based censorship of speech and raise First Amendement freedom of speech issues.  But in fact the U.S. Supreme Court already addressed this kind of problem in Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier, in which the Court said that school officials could engage in content-based editing or exclusion from school publications.  A year book is a school publication and the school officials have the discretion to permit this harmless photo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
